Al Jazeera's Sebastian Walker asks why a system that was designed to help Haitians ended up exacerbating their misery.
Join Al Jazeera's social media community
The Stream is a social media community with its own daily TV show.
The hashtag #SudanUnderSanction began trending recently when young Sudanese took to Twitter to share the adverse impacts of life under US sanctions. The restrictions first imposed in 1993, and massively expanded in 1997, have severely hit the country's economy and health care system.
International support for them has increased since Sudan began carrying out a military campaign in Darfur, which has led to the killings of up to 300,000 people and the displacement of more than 2.5 million since 2003. But now the blockade is coming under question.
Idriss Jazairy, the UN Special Rapporteur on the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the enjoyment of human rights, recently said the sanctions' "full impact is on innocent citizens", without hurting "officials or any elite group".
Even with exceptions for medicine and other humanitarian goods, critics say the blockade is too sweeping and cumbersome for ordinary citizens to get the supplies they need.
On this episode of the Stream, we'll hear from proponents and opponents of the sanctions, and explore the broader issue of how Western-led blockades impact civilians living under the governments they ostensibly target.
On today's episode, we speak to:
Omer Ismail @omerish
Senior advisor, Enough Project
Ahmed Elmurtada @AhmedElmurtada
Information security engineer, Duko Team
Ibrahim Warde @IbrahimWarde
Author, "The price of fear: The truth behind the financial war on terror"
Civil society activist from Nuba mountains
What do you think? Share your views in the comment section below.